Many of us will remember that game of
Musical Chairs we played as kids! It was a simple game, played with 33 1/3
LPs and a parent lifting up the stylus in my time! When the music stopped, everyone tried to sit in a chair, but there was always one less chair than kids, and someone had to step out of the game - a chair is removed and the game continues until there are two people and one chair. Then one winner!
What does this have to do with Business Development? Well, the rules of Musical Chairs change in
BD, but the game is similar. Chairs come and go, sometimes in blocks, at an alarming rate, and it is hard to hear the music. Mergers change the layout and
comfort of chairs, and market evolution serves to add or removes chairs over time. The goal,
nonetheless, is to sit in the most comfy chair in the room at the right time.
The "Chairs" in our version of the game are potential acquirers, the "Players" are typically venture-backed companies evolving from incubation through revenue, to some level of market
recognition, trying to guess what the right time is, and who their eventual buyer might be. Sitting in a chair means you have reached your exit, and the comfort of the chair is a reflection of the "best price" for your circumstances. With the state of today's public stock markets, an acquisition is the most likely "liquidity event" for most of today's
startups, so this should be important stuff to today's entrepreneurs and investors.
But, why does this really matter? In Three Dimensional Business Development, 3
DBD, we need to consider our alliance strategy from now until the music stops as a game of Musical Chairs, and plan alliances that take us ever closer to our favorite chair. And, as most of us are probably a bit picky, our choice of favorite chair can change over time, which adds another dimension to the game.
Let's look at an example: Argon Tech has the opportunity to do an
OEM deal with
Immense Business Networks,
IBN. They consider
IBN one of about 4 potential acquirers they see today, but don't yet have the revenue to justify the required exit price. So, as they are working on a deal, a 3
DBD approach would suggest taking some steps including:
- make sure that the terms of the deal are not so good that IBN doesn't need to acquire Argon,
- this deal doesn't "repel" Argon's other chairs - potential acquirers, and
- that this is the right time and sequence for this deal with IBN.
So, having a naturally evolving strategy for who your potential acquirers are as well as an optimum path to reach them is critical to forming strategic alliances, even in the early years. An evolving strategy deliberately includes key company stakeholders in an ongoing discussion of the chairs in the room, and which seem most comfy in your chosen exit time frame.
So, next time you grab your kids or grand kids and that old LP and record player (OK, OK, CD and remote control) to play some Musical Chairs, think about what names you would put on the chairs today - or in 6 months.
Next time I will dig a little deeper into the alliance life cycle...
Peace,
Michael
CMT Consulting, Inc. - Business Development Consulting Services